Red Bull Boss Slams Mass Migration, Forced Multiculturalism in Europe

It does happen, that despite the gloomy forecasts, a bright ray of truth breaks through the dark artificial clouds of pathological bullshit:

Breitbart: In a rare interview, Red Bull boss and Austria’s richest man Dietrich Mateschitz has slammed mass migration and political correctness, warning they threaten to destroy Europe’s true cultural diversity.

Speaking to Kleine Zeitung, the Formula 1 investor called the decision of key politicians to open the borders — which resulted in Europe’s migration crisis — “unpardonable”, noting that “if a company were to make mistakes on the same scale, it would have gone broke”.

Highlighting the “hypocrisies” of what he called the “refugees welcome brigade” with regards to migration, Mateschitz said: “I am talking about the fact that none of the people shouting ‘refugees welcome’ or [Chancellor Angela Merkel’s famous phrase] ‘we can do it’ were preparing their own guest rooms or tents in their gardens to accommodate half a dozen migrants.

“Even then it was clear to everyone that most of the people [arriving in the continent] did not correspond to the definition of the refugee. In any case, not the Geneva Convention”.

In the interview, Mateschitz took a stand against the “destabilisation of Europe”, which he said threatens the “uniqueness of [the continent’s] diversity and individuality with its different cultures and languages”.

“I hope I’m not the only one who’s worried that one of the highest officials in Brussels said that countries which aren’t multicultural should be wiped off the map”, Mateschitz told the newspaper, possibly alluding to comments made by European Commission Vice-President Frans Timmermans in 2015.

“Any society, anywhere in the world, will be diverse in the future — that’s the future of the world,” Timmermans said, demanding that Eastern and Central EU nations undergo similar demographic transitions to Western Europe.

Of political correctness, Mateschitz said: “It seems that no one dares to tell the truth, even if everyone knows what the truth is.”

“The elites want citizens to be frightened, and easily manipulated,” he added.

The Red Bull founder said he sees numerous problems plaguing the European Union (EU), the architects of whom he fingered as belonging to a “so-called intellectual elite” with nothing to contribute to the continent.

“Policies which are steeped in political correctness have been imposed in the name of a self-proclaimed, so-called intellectual elite who have nothing to contribute to our country neither economically nor culturally despite their best intentions,” he said.

Mateschitz also poured scorn on how Russia has been framed as the EU’s nemesis by large parts of the media and Western liberal establishment, telling Kleine Zeitung: “I do not need anyone to tell me who my enemies are.”

Criticising attempts to destroy the former Soviet superpower through economic sanctions, the Formula 1 investor pointed out that “for Europe as a whole [this policy] results in losing billions of Euros”.

Challenged by the Austrian newspaper with the assertion that he too is an ‘elite’, Mateschitz hit back, describing himself as a “humanist” but “someone who basically opposes any dogma”.

Speaking about banning the Islamic veil, a talking point in Austria currently, the Red Bull boss said: “I can’t bring myself to think that this is really a matter of any importance … It’s silly to make a political issue out of something like this when there are far more pressing matters.”

Millennial Woes: “Specific issues don’t really matter, Left is just a splat of leftism on the landscape”

This is part of a really interesting series of videos MW presents from the Netherlands, exploring the decline there with visits to some pretty dangerous zones of intense diversity.

This particular video however is about the Women’s March in Amsterdam, an overwhelmingly white event, that gathers women, militant homosexuals, transsexuals, pro-immigration activists and Antifa-types into one seething concoction of drivel that stands for absolutely nothing apart from white pathology, or -edit-, depending on your point of view, whites collectively seeking approval by pandering to the ruinous ideas of (((others))).

MW describes the vulgar disorder of the left, how hopeless their marches are, how they just throw out the same collection of sentiments again and again, and how –despite claiming to be anti-establishment, their ideas are simply those sanctioned by the establishment.

The guy he is with describes how despite the Left’s efforts, minorities don’t give ‘a shit’ for this stuff.

Tony Blair: The poison continues…

One thing that caught my attention recently was an article by our old friend, Tony Blair in the New York Times.

Blair has put himself –or is (((being))) put, at the forefront of a so called ‘centrist’ campaign against what he correctly describes as a popular revolt in the West, culminating in Trump’s election and Brexit, which he of course opposes.

While Blair’s new political activity should be a cause for great concern, there is an immediate silver lining to this cloud. It suggests there really aren’t that many people corrupt and debased enough who can actually take on this role. Blair, despite his absolutely soiled track record with the public, finds himself regularly reused as a frontman for the forces of globalization and anti-whiteness.

Blair says:

The modus operandi of this populism is not to reason but to roar. It has at times an anarchic feel. Yet it has also mobilized a powerful media behind it. Its supporters welcome the outrage their leaders provoke.

The causes of this movement are the scale, scope and speed of change. This is occurring economically as jobs are displaced and communities fractured, and culturally as the force of globalization moves the rest of the world closer and blurs old boundaries of nation, race and culture.

Not that the ‘change’ itself is a bad thing. It’s just the ‘speed’ of racial and national blurring that’s the problem. Blair’s view has always been that if you ‘mitigate’ the effects of globalization, i.e: placate whites with more worthless jobs in call centers or government, provide them with more state handouts, devalued degrees, and more CCTV cameras to try to dissuade blacks, Somalis and Muslims from raping white women, the underlying objections will just go away and whites will welcome their displacement and everything will be fine. They will simply exchange their human dignity, race, culture and values for things that will only hurt them more. Just explain to them it’s ‘modern’ and ‘progressive’. That’s basically Blair’s modus operandi.

Blair goes on:

The same dynamics are splintering the left, too. One element has aligned with the right in revolt against globalization, but with business taking the place of migrants as the chief evil. They agree with the right-wing populists about elites, though for the left the elites are the wealthy, while for the right they’re the liberals.

This leftist populism is a profound error. It has no chance of matching the populist appeal of the right, and it dangerously validates some of the right’s arguments. This only fuels a cynicism that depresses support for the more progressive parts of the left’s program.

Blair’s entire career has been as a fanatical apologist and Mr Fixit for these elites, and that means trying to nullify any arguments against things elites want, like globalization, white genocide and war. What Blair is really saying here, is that our arguments are extremely sound. They are so sound, that parts of the Left have actually found a way to agree with them. That means they are not a ‘nutty right wing conspiracy’, rather they have an observable objective basis, and that makes them extremely dangerous. One of the strategies of people like Blair is to drive a wedge between the Right and the sections of the Left who have the capacity to agree with us, so there can never be any political consensus against these elites that Blair represents.

But this left tendency has gained from the seeming paralysis of the center. The parties and politicians of the center have become the managers of the status quo in an era when people want change. So, the center — in both its center-right and center-left camps — is marginalized, even despised.

It’s despised because it’s caused immense harm. Firstly, the ‘center’ – center-left or center-right, is really just another version of the Left as far as its most zealous ideological advocates are concerned.

‘The center’ is a consolidation of the power between different vectors; extremes of global capitalism on the one hand and ‘social justice’ on the other, that were once at odds with each other, but are now merged into one toxic blob.

Particularly, the center has become ideologically dominated by the cultural goals of the Left, which rely on the cover it provides to appear less-threatening, utilizing less-obvious language to obscure its intentions.

So this ‘center’ is not really a center as it has a specific direction: towards more immigration, diversity, globalization and degeneracy. It never goes away from it. Sure the center-right will pay lip service to going the other way to get votes from whites, but it never actually does anything.

The term ‘center’ is dishonest as the objectives of its most staunch advocates are not politically neutral. The phrase provides legitimacy and cover, making it seem reasonable and moderate rather than its own kind of fanaticism.

After that, the center is really just a coalition of reality-denying white cucks, virtue-signalling to one another demonstrating how eager they are to flood their countries with hostile raping retards from the Third World, and to appease organized Jewish power.

Even when some of them don’t really want to flood their countries with the Third World, the center-right is so scared of being called racist and bigoted it can’t actually stop it anyway. This means the center is not actually in control of any of its own policies. It’s an empty political position, where many of its representatives hold no political authority of their own, where they have deferred power and choices to other groups and lobbyists, the centrists’ role simply being to appease the demands of those other groups. It’s a form of signalling and obedience.

The question is, will this be a temporary phase, perhaps linked to the aftermath of the 2008 financial crisis and Sept. 11, and will politics soon revert to normal, or has a new political age begun?

There are fragments of truth even in what Blair says. I wonder if Blair too sees 9/11 as a necessary component in laying the foundation for some of things we see today?

The party structures on both sides of the Atlantic have their origins in the Industrial Revolution and the debates engendered by that epoch about socialism and capitalism, the market and the state. These parties have endured because the roots they put down were very strong. But now, there are different distinctions than those simply of traditional right and left.

When I was growing up, people like my dad were conservative; and that meant economically and socially. Today, many such voters don’t fit that old stereotype. They may be pro-private enterprise and conservative on economics in traditional terms, but they’re also socially liberal — in favor, for instance, of gay rights. And there are those who used to vote left, but who are culturally illiberal and now don’t mind voting for parties of the wealthy.

Although they sometimes go under other names like ‘Western values’, it’s race and identity that are now naturally and rightfully emerging as the critical fault lines. Old stereotypical notions of left or right, were indeed once relevant in the near mono-racial era of Tony Blair’s father when everyone was white.

Today, a distinction that often matters more than traditional right and left is open vs. closed. The open-minded see globalization as an opportunity but one with challenges that should be mitigated; the closed-minded see the outside world as a threat.

Make no mistake, black violence, Muslims blowing themselves up and raping white children are a threat. The sewage of diversity is a threat. The debasing effects of diversity on white institutions is a threat. Unteachable schools, ‘no go zones’ are a threat. Laws to facilitate and protect diversity and to facilitate white displacement are a threat. And white genocide is a very big, very real threat. The ‘open-minded’ people pushing these policies do so exactly because they are a threat, while ‘progressive’ gentile whites who support these policies, or claim to, are damaged goods, hate themselves or are simply not grown up enough to deal with the reality of the world as it is. So their views cannot be accepted as having a legitimate basis. Like it or not, they have to be denied any political say at all.

This distinction crosses traditional party lines and thus has no organizing base, no natural channel for representation in electoral politics.

Again, because it’s racial. It’s much more fundamental.

So this leaves a big space in the center. For the progressive wing of politics, the correct strategy is to make the case for building a new coalition out from the center. To do so, progressives need to acknowledge the genuine cultural anxieties of those voters who have deserted the cause of social progress: on immigration, the threat of radical Islamism and the difference between being progressive and appearing obsessive on issues like gender identity.

It’s not enough to ‘acknowledge the genuine cultural anxieties of voters’, you actually have to STOP doing things that injure them. If you refuse to stop, you will be stopped.

The politics of the progressive center has not died, but it needs reinventing and re-energizing. For liberal democracy to survive and thrive, we must build a new coalition that is popular, not populist.

‘Popular’ means it’s manufactured, spun and where a corrupt media can be relied upon to issue favorable propaganda. But no it has died. It’s died morally and ideologically. The ‘progressive center’ basically means a Jewish and oligarchical center having a disproportionate influence over the policies of white governments to suit their own interests. It means pushing immigration, diversity and selling degeneracy to whites to distract them while it’s happening. The ‘liberal democracy’ Blair espouses, which has to a large extent become an elite ‘dog-whistle’ for white genocide, doesn’t deserve to survive. It deserves to die.

But you know what ? I think it’s great Blair has put himself forward as a champion of ‘liberal democracy’ and left-centrism. It just shows how completely morally bankrupt the mainstream Left is if they will tolerate this soiled wretched perverter as their spokesperson.

This was the same problem that dogged Hillary Clinton in the election. A large swathe of liberal America just couldn’t accept that she was not actually electable. So they told themselves ‘she was the lesser of two evils’. Fuck off.

If I was Blair, I would would be genuinely concerned about this new populism. Last time, when I said the right place for Blair is hanging from a lamppost, I wasn’t being flippant. Blair’s concerns about where this new ‘roaring’ revolt may lead are quite real. If the forces that are protecting and promoting Blair are sufficiently overturned, Blair will inevitably be hanging from a lamppost.

Tony Blair: An illustration of evil

I don’t want to be that crude and absolute about it, but it’s really not such a stretch to describe Tony Blair’s entire career as essentially being a fervent implementer for the will of organized Jewry, presenting Jewish values, such as globalism, mass immigration and White Genocide as something Gentile and of essential interest to everyone. As such, his latest move should come as little surprise:

Former British Prime Minister Tony Blair launched a campaign Friday to persuade the U.K. to rethink its decision to leave the European Union, saying those who want to remain should rise up and make their wishes known. Blair argued that the Conservative government’s drive to leave the EU “at any cost” will hurt future generations and damage the unity of the country itself.

Last year’s vote to leave the 28-nation bloc was “based on imperfect knowledge” and Britons made their decision without knowing the true terms of Brexit, he said in a speech in London

Blair is a strange mix of high corruption -insomuch as his corruption is obscured by high-minded self-deception and blessed by those he serves, and a kind of extreme evangelical mania. Where a wishlist from Jewish and corporate elites ends, and his own psyche begins is extraordinarily difficult to tell, but he’s certainly very much aligned to the former, having presided over the most radical and explicitly anti-white government in the history of the United Kingdom.

Then there are some significant parallels between Tony Blair and his ghoulish wife Cherie, and the intrigues of the Clintons, even down to Cherie’s own bizarre version of ‘spirit cooking’ which involves collecting her husband’s toenails in a jar for a witch to perform spells over.

Certainly, Tony Blair is somebody who’s sold his soul to the Devil in return for power. He’s a destroyer, a nation-wrecker and a committed servant of the forces of evil. His job, whether as prime minister, ‘European extremism (aka antisemitism) chairman‘, or now as somebody trying to interfere with Brexit, is to manipulate white people into believing that their genocide is a good and healthy progressive advancement; a kind of ‘necessity for the modern age’.

If they can just make way for the swarms of child-raping, illiterate mud people, just allow more multinational mega-corporations to ruin their communities, just give up the last remains of sovereignty, humanity and dignity they have, just allow their institutions to be poisoned and overthrown, just consent to more wars for Israel, just become compliant drones living in a government-run panopticon -managed by unaccountable invisible elites somewhere then real social progress will have been made.

The rightful next stage for Blair’s career is simply to be hung from a lamppost.

From Rwanda to Lego, the Tragedy of the Left: Richard Wilson

I was surprised to read this story that British left wing activist Richard Wilson, has actually been successful in his “#StopFundingHate” campaign to get the toy manufacturer Lego to stop advertising in the Daily Mail, because he feels, the Mail’s coverage of the ‘refugee’ crisis is ‘hate’ to sell newspapers.

The Danish toy company Lego said Saturday it won’t advertise anymore in Britain’s Daily Mail, one of several British newspapers targeted by a social media campaign for their anti-immigrant stances.

The maker of multi-colored Lego building bricks tweeted Saturday “@StopFundingHate We have finished the agreement with the Daily Mail.”

Richard Wilson works for NGOs and appears to be a blogger and occasional writer of so called ‘skepticism’ (aka he’s basically an apologist for liberal/state/Jewish power), and he’s written various ‘skeptic’ books.

What’s interesting, and extremely tragic about Wilson is that his sister Charlotte, herself an NGO worker, who held a PhD, was brutally murdered in Burundi in 2000, in a case that garnered some publicity at the time, in large part due to Richard Wilson’s own efforts to turn it into a ‘human rights’ issue. (She was also engaged to an African -with an IQ possibly just one third of her own).

So you have this educated liberal family with the sister going to ‘help’ blacks in Burundi (essentially they both gravitated towards incentivized careers in anti-whiteness with creepy NGOs). The sister ‘falls in love’ with one of them, and is then murdered in an operation that was widely believed to be the work of Hutu-extremist group Palipehutu-FNL (i.e blacks).

The passengers, who had travelled from Kigali in Rwanda, were robbed of their valuables and then separated according to their ethnicity. Hutus and most Congolese were released unharmed. The Tutsis on board, and one British woman, Charlotte Wilson, who was traveling with her Burundian fiancé, were forced to lie face down on the ground and then shot. According to news reports, one of the Hutu passengers had been told to “tell the army we’re going to kill them all and there’s nothing you can do.”

You white people you are the ones that supplied all the weapons,” he yelled at her. “Now you are going to feel what it is like.”

Wilson’s sister was a clear victim of inter-ethnic, indeed inter-racial violence, so it seems entirely inappropriate for him to be demanding immigration from the war-torn Third World into his own country today, an action that will result in more sisters being raped, assaulted and even killed.

But apparently the addiction to moral highs and liberal peer-approval in demanding anti-white policies supersedes not only his own tragedy, it’s actually more important than any of the consequences it engenders to the receiving population.

Wilson did not learn from what happened and adapt his worldview, joining the obvious dots between his sister’s awful murder and interfering in the ethnic affairs of primitive violent populations. Instead he remains committed to the worst kind of pathological virtue-signalling, and virtue-seeking at any cost.

And today this signalling and seeking has worked in recruiting others to the cause, like Lego who now want to bravely show how moral and pious they are too and how much they love their customers’ sisters being victims of inter-racial violence.

Yes, his sister’s death was a tragedy, however fucking stupid she was to wade into a war zone where different gangs of negroes with IQs closer to chimpanzees were hacking each other to pieces with machetes.

Let’s also concede that tragedy can affect people in different ways that may not always seem entirely reasoned to outside observers.

But it’s safe to say that Wilson is more than familiar with the violent dysfunction of the Third World, which means his intent to increase Third World populations in the UK can only be interpreted as a hostile one, while his personal loss provides a moral shield to peddle anti-whiteness.

Wilson believes it’s his moral duty, not to focus on the real causes of his sister’s murder but to accelerate the decline of more whites, by seeking to deprive them of what pitiful – and ironically rather flawed I might add, anti-immigration coverage there is.

His campaign is trying to say that even having an anti-immigration position is just beyond the limits of acceptable discourse. It’s hate and off-limits. He’s saying it’s a moral imperative to inject the UK with the Third World.

Wilson’s campaign appears to be a reflection of his own lamentable white pathological altruism, and his inability to really deal with what killed his sister. It was never an issue of ‘human rights’, a concept completely alien to black Africa. Charlotte Wilson was killed by blacks during an inter-black war because she was white. Furthermore, whatever her feelings, she was there for really bad reasons. Her murder is a textbook argument against diversity. Rather than facing reality, Wilson now seeks to punish others.

Some people may suspect that Richard Wilson is Jewish, acting in ways destructive to white people to advance Jewish interests, or acting on behalf of Jewish interests. After some research I couldn’t find any clear evidence of that, but his actions are completely consistent with Jewish political activity.

Although #StopFundingHate has also been especially animated by the Mail’s coverage of the treacherous judges who became involved in seeking to stop Brexit, two of them being Jewish, and the entire anti-Brexit subversion being almost exclusively Jewish.

Jews Are Leading the Legal Fight Against Brexit

Dr Andrew Joyce/Occidental Observer: Quite apart from any ‘conspiracy theory,’ the facts about the legal challenge to Brexit are as follows:

The legal bid appears to have been initiated by Alex Chesterman, a Jewish businessman.

The bid was delegated to the law firm Mischon de Reya, founded by a Jewish lawyer, and that has retained a strong synthesis between its work and that of Jewish interests.

The legal bid has been led by a Jewish lawyer, David Pannick, QC.

In an effort to obscure the staffing and clientele behind the bid, David Pannick approached the Royal Courts of Justice to obtain masking measures for the bid.

This measure was granted by Lord Justice Sir Brian Leveson, also Jewish.

Finally, the legal bid was accepted by three judges at the High Court, two of whom, Terence Etherton and Philip Sales, are Jewish.

Read entire article…

‘One ISIS attack every 84 hours’ spurs dread and anger in Europe

CNN: In the past week I have seen flowers and candles carpeting a street in Munich, the tranquility of a small Bavarian town shattered by a suicide bomb and a small church in suburban France sealed off after its octogenarian priest had his throat cut.

Before these horrific events, there was a knife-wielding teenager on a German train. And before that, much deadlier attacks in Nice, Brussels and last November, in Paris.

This year has seen an accelerating pattern of attacks linked to ISIS in Europe and beyond — from Turkey to Bangladesh, the United States to Indonesia. According to the group IntelCenter, which tracks acts of terrorism, there has been a significant attack directed or inspired by ISIS every 84 hours since June 8 in cities outside the war zones in Iraq, Syria, Sinai in Egypt and Libya. CNN’s own tracking of attacks supports that conclusion.

More than half of those attacks have been beyond big cities in places “not traditionally under threat of terrorist attacks,” says IntelCenter. This rash of random, low-tech but deadly attacks has fueled public unease in Europe and eroded faith in governments to tackle the threat of terrorism or discern who might turn to violence.

Diversity murders children again in Munich

CNN: At least nine people were killed and 16 others injured Friday in a shooting rampage at a busy shopping district in Munich, Germany, police said.

Police searched for attackers, thinking there might be three, and found a man who had killed himself on a side street near Olympia shopping mall, police Chief Hubertus Andrae said.

Based on surveillance video and witness statements, police concluded he was the sole gunman, Andrae said.

The unidentified attacker was an 18-year-old German-Iranian who had lived in Munich for at least two years.

[…]

Many children were among the casualties.

[…]

The gunman in Munich started shooting at a McDonald’s across from the Olympia mall around 5:50 p.m. (11:50 a.m. ET), Andrae said.

A witness who wanted to be identified only by her first name, Lauretta, told CNN her son was in the bathroom with a shooter at the restaurant.

“That’s where he loaded his weapon,” she said. “I hear like an alarm and boom, boom, boom … and he’s still killing the children. The children were sitting to eat. They can’t run.”