World’s Worst interview with Jared Taylor

Described on YouTube as “Editor of American Renaissance, Jared Taylor sits down with ABC News’ (((Amna Nawaz))) on “Uncomfortable” for a blunt discussion of race and racism in America.”

Every time this woman starts to get in over her head with the facts she demands to “move on” to another subject.

Actually there is a worse interview with Mr Taylor with a ridiculous wigger.

Everything you need to know about Black History Month

black history month

To have a meaningful history as a people, you need to have a firm grasp of the concept of history, a means of recording that history, the desire to learn and discover new things from that history that inform the present. You need a sense of time. You need a sense of right and wrong, of good and evil, of morality, of justice and injustice , of purpose, of process. You need the ability to embrace and interpret facts. Perhaps most significantly of all, you need the capacity to desire a history, to want it, to care about it.

Call me blunt, but blacks as a race don’t possess any of those attributes sufficiently.

As it happens, black history month owes its origins to an early kind of ‘black studies’ promoted by the negro Carter Godwin Woodson who said:

“If a race has no history, it has no worthwhile tradition, it becomes a negligible factor in the thought of the world, and it stands in danger of being exterminated. The American Indian left no continuous record. He did not appreciate the value of tradition; and where is he today? The Hebrew keenly appreciated the value of tradition, as is attested by the Bible itself. In spite of worldwide persecution, therefore, he is a great factor in our civilization.”

While that has some truth to it, the reality is, Woodson had to imitate the importance of history to other groups. He had to be influenced by the experience created by American whites. He had to embrace something blacks themselves didn’t actually have and can’t ever really possess.

The truth is black history is really a history of the biological differences between blacks and whites; it’s a history of primitivism, dysfunction and violence. It’s a history of rape, murder, assault and looting. It’s history of incapacity, inability, of being trained like chimpanzees to ride a comedy bike by well-meaning whites. It’s a history where everything blacks appear to have actually comes from whites and other groups.

If you want to get a good understanding of black history just follow the trail of spit on the sidewalk. That is black history.

If you want to understand black history look at the crime statistics.

If you want to understand black history look at the education statistics.

If you want to understand black history look at Chicago, Detroit, South Africa, Haiti.

As far as whites are concerned, their interest in a ‘black history month’ is because they know deep down, blacks are not capable of having one. So it’s a compensation for not having a history. It’s a pretense, another vulgar way for whites to demonstrate their virtue to other whites, and feel bigger and smugger by ‘helping’ blacks.

Further reading: black history month resources at Counter-Currents

Michelle Obama likened to an ape again. Is there a pattern ?

I missed this just before Christmas. On the one hand we constantly hear about how ‘popular’ Michelle Obama is – how ‘well liked’ she is by Americans, but for someone so well liked, Obama certainly attracts a lot of unflattering comments and comparisons to non-human primates, as the New York Times reports:

Carl Paladino, a western New York builder, one-time Republican candidate for governor of New York and political ally of President-elect Donald J. Trump, came under fire on Friday for racially offensive comments about President Obama and the first lady… […]

“I’d like her to return to being a male and let loose in the outback of Zimbabwe where she lives comfortably in a cave with Maxie, the gorilla,” he said.

Objectively, it should be of major concern that the First Lady of the United States is sometimes not perceived as a human woman.

So are the people who liken Obama to an ape or gorilla morally-flawed, unsophisticated or stupidly hateful ? Or are those who don’t liken Obama to an ape or gorilla lying about –or suppressing, what they actually see?

Somalia in America

Challenging bigoted racist stereotypes of Somalis as savage degenerate apes, one intrepid young Somali Muslim decided to prove them all wrong:

An Ohio State University student posted a rant shortly before he plowed a car into a campus crowd and stabbed people with a butcher knife in an ambush that ended when a police officer shot him dead, a law enforcement official said.

Abdul Razak Ali Artan, 18, wrote on what appears to be his Facebook page that he had reached a “boiling point,” made a reference to “lone wolf attacks” and cited radical cleric Anwar al-Awlaki.

“America! Stop interfering with other countries, especially Muslim Ummah [community]. We are not weak. We are not weak, remember that,” the post said.

Officials cautioned that they have not determined a motive for the ambush

We see a lot of this blatant motive denial in the media when it comes to Somalis, even when the killer makes their motives abundantly clear: as a Muslim intent on causing death to non-Somali non-Muslims..

But these attacks remain just one big mystery to the media.

It’s part of the same white-genocide-protecting lie machine that claimed ‘mental illness’ was the cause of Somali-on-white terrorist violence

Usual lies backfire in latest London attack by Somali

The police and media across Europe have introduced a new bureaucratic obfuscation: that some non-European Muslim attacks on Europeans are due to ‘mental illness’, that such attacks are ‘isolated’ and not related to terrorism.

Such is the case in the latest attack in London by a ‘Norwegian’ of Somali origin, killing an American woman and injuring several others.

“So far we have found no evidence of radicalization or anything that would suggest the man in our custody was motivated by terrorism”…

“Whilst the investigation is not yet complete, all of the work that we have done so far increasingly points to this tragic incident as having been triggered by mental health issues”

Mental illness or not, the attacker wasn’t attacking other Somalis.

The problem with this presentation of ‘mental illness’, is it willfully omits the fact these attacks derive from the same collection of non-European populations that are committing and spreading terrorist violence, where that violence is often completely normal in their own countries, and who have been inappropriately injected into European countries where their violence is aimed at people of European origin.

It willfully omits the fact that these groups, particularly of African origin, are anthropologically primitive, have biological tendencies towards unprovoked and savage violence, have dramatically low IQs, and are morally retarded.

It willfully omits the fact that all groups in general have in-group preferences and out-group hostilities, and mixing different groups is a recipe for conflict.

So who gives a fuck if it was terrorism anyway ?

To pretend the problem is just ‘terrorism’, and that everyone can ‘be relieved and go back to sleep’ if it isn’t, is a gross misrepresentation of the wider consequences of immigration.

The snowballing catastrophe for the West is not just about ‘radical Islam’, although that is a trend and now a serious problem. The fundamental issue lies in this deluded notion of introducing backwards groups from the Third World, separated by tens of thousands of years of evolution, as well as more ‘developed’ Muslim countries into white societies, and hoping these groups will act like liberal white hipsters.

Unfortunately, in their efforts to deny the racial significance of the attackers and victims, to frame Third World murders of Europeans as ‘isolated’, and especially to exonerate diversity (aka white genocide), the establishment have tripped over themselves. This latest attack comes on the back of another attack in London by a ‘mentally ill’ Somali. During the trial the Telegraph reported:

Isil fanatics are deliberately targeting people with mental health problems to inspire them to carry out terror attacks, a police chief has warned after a man suffering from psychosis was convicted of trying to behead a tube passenger.

So in an effort to protect diversity the narrative has become a mess. It’s gone from ‘terrorists recruit mentally ill Somalis to conduct terror’ to ‘mentally ill Somalis just go out and kill people randomly’. It’s gone from one story where the ‘mentally ill’ are used as mere pawns because they are vulnerable, to another where their mental illness was the cause.

Both claims are only consistent insomuch as they lead people away from the truth:– that Somalis are not fit to be among Europeans, and a very significant section the population of Somalia –for whom it is simply a normal racial trait, would fall under the definition of ‘mentally ill’ or psychopathic by European standards,

It should therefore come as little surprise that Somalia itself is an unrelenting fetid shit hole of a region. It doesn’t even have a government to speak of, the closest it has is Sharia Law. It’s a region of incessant violence, poverty and intense retardation, and is virtually at the very bottom of the Global Peace Index. “Mired in political instability and famine”, “Somalia remains a failed state“. Corruption is “rampant…tied with North Korea for last place among the 175 countries surveyed in Transparency International’s 2014 Corruption Perceptions Index”.

A small irony about these attacks is that because of diversity, some of these attacks do happen to include non-Europeans, in this case an Israeli and in other cases Hong Kong Chinese.