World’s Worst interview with Jared Taylor

Described on YouTube as “Editor of American Renaissance, Jared Taylor sits down with ABC News’ (((Amna Nawaz))) on “Uncomfortable” for a blunt discussion of race and racism in America.”

Every time this woman starts to get in over her head with the facts she demands to “move on” to another subject.

Actually there is a worse interview with Mr Taylor with a ridiculous wigger.

Millennial Woes: “Specific issues don’t really matter, Left is just a splat of leftism on the landscape”

This is part of a really interesting series of videos MW presents from the Netherlands, exploring the decline there with visits to some pretty dangerous zones of intense diversity.

This particular video however is about the Women’s March in Amsterdam, an overwhelmingly white event, that gathers women, militant homosexuals, transsexuals, pro-immigration activists and Antifa-types into one seething concoction of drivel that stands for absolutely nothing apart from white pathology, or -edit-, depending on your point of view, whites collectively seeking approval by pandering to the ruinous ideas of (((others))).

MW describes the vulgar disorder of the left, how hopeless their marches are, how they just throw out the same collection of sentiments again and again, and how –despite claiming to be anti-establishment, their ideas are simply those sanctioned by the establishment.

The guy he is with describes how despite the Left’s efforts, minorities don’t give ‘a shit’ for this stuff.

“We are not afraid” people are just afraid of being called racist

After the latest enriching diversity-violence in London, an old meme quickly reemerged from the cobweb-covered wardrobe of white pathology and UK government propaganda.

‘We are not afraid’ first appeared immediately after the 7/7 bombings in London 2005, attributed to some pleb, but was rapidly adopted as a central piece of government and media propaganda under the Blair government.

You know, sometimes it’s just not appropriate to say you’re ‘not afraid’.

That statement implies you are afraid. Afraid of dealing with the real cause of the problem. You’re afraid of having to confront reality. You’re afraid of all of the accumulated lies you’ve absorbed and consented to spilling out over the floor, and how that will make you look. How are you going to explain them ? How are you going to explain to people in your life that you’ve actually been trying to harm them with these lies ?

You’re deeply afraid of being made a social pariah, of being called a racist. And you would rather people die and get maimed than be called a racist.

You are afraid. You are pathetic.

Terrorism is easy to be brave and stoic with, it’s ‘abstract’, ‘out there somewhere’ and the actual day-to-day risks of death from terrorism are still remote, albeit significantly increased by the presence of non-white populations.

Being brave and defiant towards the idea of a kind of abstract violence that you will probably never have to confront, claiming you will ‘not let it divide us’ allows you to signal your compliance to power, to demonstrate you are a ‘good person’, bypassing the actual reason it happened at all.

It must feel great to be a useful idiot –reinforcing the narrative and taboo of diversity, thereby ensuring more people are victims of terrorism.

The right advice to Londoners, and people in the UK generally is do be afraid.

And if you’re not afraid of getting run over by some worthless hate-filled negro, with a history of racially-motivated serious assault who wants his worthless life to mean something in the eyes of other negroes, and who believed in his worthless shit-brain that Islam makes his hatred righteous, be afraid of acid being thrown in your face, of rape, of remorseless violence. Be afraid of your daughters being dragged into a Pakistani pedophile ring, and the authorities being too afraid of being called racist to do anything – my God they could really have done with the ‘We are not afraid’ meme.

Also be afraid of what your government will do to clamp down on your rights after every new terrorist act, introducing new laws about hate speech, incitement, and pushing for more internet snooping as they will always do – their real target being whites. It’s all part of the enriching effect of diversity.

Be afraid. Be very afraid.

Black responsible for London attack: Race>Citizenship

So it turns out the London ‘terrorist’, Khalid Masood – born Adrian Elms from Kent, was actually a rather typical violent, maladjusted negro with mixed parents, completely at odds with the very white environment it grew up in, and sought outlets for its own biological tendency towards extreme violence. Islam, which it picked up in prison, provided this creature with a new kind of legitimacy for its own tendencies.

This was a very typical black, who’s unwelcome presence predictably managed to harm a rural community in the UK where it was born, thanks to its race-mixing selfish stupid cunt-whore white mother:

Adrian Elms was born on Christmas Day 1964, in the Dartford area of Kent, to a white British mother and a black father, who were not married. Twenty years later they moved to Tunbridge Wells where they set up home with his stepfather and two half-brothers.

where it notched up a string of convictions for serious violent offenses, which it claims it was driven to, because of ‘muh racism’.

So we come full circle. Islam is a problem, and it has no place in European countries, but blacks are violent anyway, including blacks with white blood, and anything that gives them a further sense of purpose and legitimacy to their violence is only going to escalate their violence. The appalling savagery of this non-human entity predates its involvement in Islam, and it just happened to be, that its final piece of violence was more spectacular and lethal than its previous ones.

We also need to remind ourselves just what a monstrosity race-mixing is, how harmful it is, and how we really need to move to a world where it incurs serious penalties.

I keep reading in the media how Masood/Elms was ‘British born’, but of course all that proves is that nations based on citizenship mean absolutely nothing as the pull of ethnicity and biology is far stronger, and that European nations have to re-establish themselves as ethnically-based, as opposed to ‘values based’ to be meaningful at all, and if they actually want these appalling atrocities to end.

Diversity caused terror in London

What a surprise! Diversity continues to enrich London. This endless supply of new cultural treats is just amazing.

NYT:LONDON — A British-born man who was once investigated for connections to violent extremism carried out the deadly attack outside Parliament in London on Wednesday, according to Prime Minister Theresa May.

London is of course one of the global flagship hubs of racial diversity and ‘tolerance’. Just like other European cities where these policies are pursued, this latest attack is the direct result.

The above video about this latest diversity terrorism by Paul Joseph Watson starts out quite well, but then strays into the ‘Islam needs to reform’ as the answer.

It’s not that Islam needs to reform (which it can’t -reform requires a certain average IQ), it’s that the racial demographic Islam spans needs to be evicted from the lives of white people. Islam should just be thought of as an extension of the race and ethnicity of violent primitive groups who have adopted it, sanctifying all their own backwardism and hatred and violence.

Islam legitimizes their savagery, organizes it, and somewhat shapes it, but they wouldn’t be that different without it.

Oddly enough, it’s probably had a use in keeping those violent primitive groups in check in their own countries, but when you start to bring those groups into European countries the results are a disaster.

Sorry Paul, but a staunch ‘Western chauvinism’ isn’t going to work, because ‘Western values’ are simply White Values, and some of these attackers are quite happy to eat MacDonalds, take drugs, watch sports, play video games and indulge in all kinds of Western crap, when they aren’t raping white children or running people over in trucks.

Watson does highlight well the absolute disaster of the Left’s position, which is basically “it’s ok for people to be killed to prove how tolerant and open minded we are in our response.”

Being killed or injured by some alien enemy who hates you doesn’t matter. What matters for the Left is maintaining the moral high ground and a glowing aura of piety and tolerance and signaling their ‘open-mindedness’. And this is why the Left is finished. It’s totally intellectually bankrupt and is should be seen for what it is: as the number one enabler of these atrocities. It’s really that simple.

Note that the Left doesn’t even seem to talk anymore about the West’s meddling and war mongering in Muslim countries as a factor in international terrorism. At least there is a component of reality in that, but that ‘high’ has long ago worn off for them and the current conflicts in the Middle East remain too abstract and messy for them to easily identify with as a moral weapon. Now it’s all just down to their own self-hatred, or hatred of us.

Trump must drain the diversity swamp to get policies through

So once again, the price of diversity for a country, even higher IQ diversity, is shown to be extremely high. Two diversity judges: Derrick K Watson, who despite his English name, is a native Hawaiian, and then Theodore D. Chuang have interfered with Trump’s watered-down plan to block Muslims from some countries.

NYT: A federal judge in Hawaii issued a nationwide order Wednesday evening blocking President Trump’s ban on travel from parts of the Muslim world, dealing a stinging blow to the White House and signaling that Mr. Trump will have to account in court for his heated rhetoric about Islam.

A second federal judge in Maryland ruled against Mr. Trump overnight, with a separate order forbidding the core provision of the travel ban from going into effect.

I don’t exactly understand how this works, so forgive me if it’s muddled, but reading the NYT it seems a lawsuit was brought about by Hawaiian attorney general Doug Chin (Chinese) in regards to “an individual plaintiff, Ismail Elshikh, the imam of the Muslim Association of Hawaii” (who it was believed) ” had reasonable grounds to challenge the order as religious discrimination”.

So you have a Chinese attorney general in Hawaii, a native Hawaiian judge appointed by a black president, a Chinese judge in Maryland and a Muslim plaintiff. Then you have a Jewish New York Times declaring it a great triumph of morality.

The only good thing I can see about this is it really does illustrate that diversity will tend to coagulate into an anti-white goo to serve its own interests and will pursue those interests through the machinery of state. Diversity, in positions of authority will try to sabotage even implicitly white policy interests.

It’s just not possible for whites to feel good, virtuous and altruistic towards other groups, share what they have with them and be in control of their own destinies.

Whites have to pick one or the other.

It also underlines some of the limitations of civic nationalism, in that totally sane and justifiable policies which appear to discriminate against certain groups will be obstructed simply on the basis of them being discriminatory:

Judge Watson flatly rejected the government’s argument that a court would have to investigate Mr. Trump’s “veiled psyche” to deduce religious animus. He quoted extensively from the remarks by Mr. Trump that were cited in the lawsuit brought by Hawaii’s attorney general, Doug Chin.

“For instance, there is nothing ‘veiled’ about this press release,” Judge Watson wrote, quoting a Trump campaign document titled “Donald J. Trump is calling for a total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States.”

I’m not sure what Trump can do to straighten things out, but to fulfill the policies he was voted in on, he really needs more powers. He needs to find a way of melting the coagulated goo of diversity interests out of the machinery of state. And that’s going to be very hard. It’s also hard within the confines of the kind of civic nationalism Trump represents, which while thankfully pushing ideas and values of interests to whites, avoids identifying them as white values.

Trump has come to power with a serious appeal to the American white vote, but non-whites are obstructing his manifesto. He’s finding the swamp needs draining even more that he first thought.

Jewish pressure gets holocaust revisionist books removed from Amazon but the holocaust is already broken

I see that a campaign in the world’s media, complaining that there were ‘holocaust denial’ books available on Amazon, and that this was unacceptable amidst a ‘new wave’ of antisemitism has been successful:

Amazon UK has removed four books from sale which question or deny the Holocaust, following discussions with the Board of Deputies.

The titles, including ‘Holocaust: The Greatest Lie Ever Told’ and ‘The Case Against the Presumed Extermination of European Jewry,’ were withdrawn from sale this week, despite it being legal to sell them in the UK.

This action was the culmination of a broad campaign by Jewish groups to shame Amazon, who really need little persuasion anyway to drop these titles. And you have probably noticed that every few years a ‘new wave’ of antisemitism, or a ‘new antisemitism‘ is announced by Jewish groups, as a justification for some neurotic incursion on the choices of the others.

Of course this latest outrage is not some moral accomplishment, or the righting of some injustice as Jewish groups claim, rather it’s the creation of a considerable injustice, and makes Amazon appear partisan, corrupt and incapable of their job as a retailer.

At the heart of these actions lies Jewish narcissism and Jewish hatred. Jewish groups are looking around to find things that might be a threat to their identity, even though they spend a disproportionate amount of time trying to undermine the identity of other groups, especially whites. They then abuse their collective power to shame companies into complying with their identity. It’s really that pathetic, by presenting the issue as a moral outrage, claiming the retailer is ‘supporting hate’ Jews get to dictate how the world is supposed to see them.

Look, as we all know, the holocaust is used as a weapon:

  • To promote the idea of uniqueness of Jews as victims, and therefore the uniqueness of Jews as people.
  • To instill whites with guilt about pursuing their own destiny.
  • To provide a moral cover for Israel’s crimes in the Middle East.

And it’s been an extremely effective weapon.

Material that interferes with that weapon has long been the subject of attack by Jewish groups who are terrified of different views of the holocaust becoming normalized. I don’t think it’s doubts about the alleged six million they really fear, a but a sense of their weapon, and therefore cultural influence slipping. They dread the day the world isn’t walking on eggshells around their sensibilities.

We do need to take these things seriously though. Every time a book that isn’t favorable to Jewish interests is banned, it’s a symbolic victory for Jewish organizations, and these actions accumulate to form a dire poisoned culture, where everyone is only permitted to have certain thoughts, so it’s critical that we completely reject the idea that banning books Jewish groups dislike is some ‘moral milestone’.

Thinking about holocaust revisionism, I have a lot of time for Germar Rudolf, I think his work is extremely impressive and reasonable, yet in every day life, I don’t care a lot about the holocaust. I think it’s boring, and we hear far too much about it. But if I’m pushed again to think about the holocaust by the inappropriate actions of Jewish groups, I would like to reframe the issue of the holocaust itself.

For some time I have felt that because of the particular way Jews have exploited and abused whatever their collective experiences were in World War II that has included: constantly misrepresenting the period in films, television shows and books, seeking to make a ‘Jew-worship/guilt’ culture of out those experiences for Gentiles with museums and education, pushing governments to institute laws punishingly non-belief, holding up the holocaust as a justification for wars today, and even using it as the basis of an extortion racket, amongst many other issues, I personally think the debate about the extent of the mistreatment of Jews during WW2 can no longer be answered rationally in the toxic environment Jews have created around the topic, and doesn’t require one.

What I’m saying is, Jews have poisoned their own cake by their inability to resist fetishizing and misusing this. Even if it was the worst tragedy in history with a zillion victims, it’s simply impossible to ever truly voluntarily know, because that position is enforced by fear, coercion, brainwashing and punishment, and to accept that position is simply to submit or agree to that ethnic coercion on the topic. No thanks.

So who cares what happened to Jews during the War ? Please count me as a new kind of denier.