The problem with the Labour Party

Haaretz: Former London mayor and veteran Labour politician Ken Livingstone is the latest Labour politician to be suspended for controversial remarks on Zionism, one day after lawmaker Naz Shah’s suspension for her anti-Israel comments.

Labour MPs called on Thursday to suspend Livingstone from the party after he rushed to his colleague’s defense and allegedly calling Hitler a Zionist, the BBC reported.

It’s entertaining to observe the Labour Party’s current morphology. It’s similar to watching a group of mentally ill imbeciles thrash about in straight-jackets, bashing their heads against the wall screaming nonsense. But there’s moments of lucidity and truth amongst the foam and insanity. And when the asylum warden comes along he takes out his baton and bashes the lunatics over the head,- not for their collective lunacy but for their brief moments of reason.

And that’s the situation with the United Kingdom’s Labour Party today. It’s true to form as a degenerate pathological mess of anti-white leftism, but at the same time it can’t seem to keep the truth about Jewish power buried. It seems to want to come out. And this is something it was completely unable to fulfill under Tony Blair, who was, and remains, a totally committed servant to the most extreme forms of Jewish-identity politics and international Jewish power.

And in many ways it’s a remarkable achievement that Ken Livingstone has twice been suspended in this way, first as London mayor, and now as a Labour Party member because of his alleged ‘antisemitic remarks’, which of course are ‘antisemitic’ only in the sense they are not Jewish-identity approved.

And, if one believes the (Jewish) media, there appears to be something of a revolt towards Jewish power in the Labour Party, all the way up to Corbyn himself.

Needless to say, organized Jewry doesn’t like that. It’s not that they simply don’t care about the crap they themselves have promulgated and managed to fill Corbyn’s wooly liberal head with, such as support for LGBT rights, anti-apartheid and diversity. But as important as those topics are in rotting white civilization to make Jewish idenity ‘real’ and increase upward mobility for Jews, when these same demands for ‘social justice’ are then turned towards them and the private policies they want for themselves it becomes a problem.

If a political party is percieved as containing elements which won’t provide unqualified support for Jewish double standards, Jewish self-aggrandizement and for Israel as a supreme power in the Middle East, the usual media campaign will follow until party members are sacked, leaders replaced with suitable puppets and policies restored to the usual garbage.

As it happens the Labour Party is garbage anyway. It’s a relic from the past that stood by and betrayed its country and the very people it purported to serve, swamping them with immigration, degredation and war in exchange for Jewish financial support.

But however degraded and irrelevant the Labour Party is, it should not apologize and sack members because their views don’t conform to the standard Jewish narrative.

Why Harriet Tubman should not be on the $20 bill, Andrew Jackson demoted scandal

Originally posted as a comment at Counter-Currents on the topic of Harriet Tubman replacing Andrew Jackson on the $20 bill, with some changes:

All over the white European world, symbols of white historical figures are being demoted, degraded or outright torn down in favor of black ones. As the excellent article on Counter-Currents states:

Honoring Tubman is not an expression of black power, but of Jewish power

It is an affront to put symbols of blacks on currency where whites are victims of black crime day in day out, and by extension – to celebrate black identity as some kind of virtue. It is an outrageous insult to victims of black crime.

It is an affront to put symbols of blacks on currency, especially militant blacks, at a time when blacks are making unreasonable demands about how their own dysfunctionality is policed, which essentially comes down to demanding the police turn a blind eye to black violence and crime because it interferes with their sense of identity, including demanding the ‘right’ to attack armed police officers and not be shot. None of their claims are grounded in reason or evidence or, needless to say – consistent with law and order, instead it is nothing more than brainless anti-white identity-hysteria egged on by Jewish plutocrats like George Soros.

It is an affront to put symbols of blacks on currency effectivelty to try to breathe new life into the dismal failure and destructive narrative of multiculturalism and diversity today, or disversity as I call it.

It is an affront to put symbols of blacks on currency where blacks have played no role in the intellectual founding of the country, and outside of their own claims (and perhaps some Jewish writers), little to no role at all in advancing the country as a whole since then, and have mostly been a serious burden on the white population. It is both disingenuous and malevolent to celebrate black activity (for the benefit of blacks) as some kind of iconic image for everyone else. It can only be for ‘everyone else’ if everyone else (whites) accept the idea of being displaced by a Jewish-steered illiterate black militancy as a virtue.

Consequently, it is an affront to put symbols of blacks on currency where blacks do not collectively wield the same level of intelligence as whites, and whatever Tubman is allegedly being celebrated for – it’s particularly unlikely to be her IQ. Tubman is thoroughly removed from the actual functioning of all of the higher institutions of America. She could not participate in them or advance them through qualities consistent with the qualities of those who founded the country.

It is an affront to sell Tubman to whites as a ‘gun toting Republican’ to try to allay fears of cultural takeover among whites, and then more so – as Jewish organizations are also at the forefront of pushing gun-control legislation, and have been spectacularly successful at corrupting the Republican party including into supporting deranged aggressive wars on behalf of Jewish interests.

It is an affront to put symbols of ugliness on currency. Tubman is ugly.

It is an affront to put alien symbols on the currency of a country founded by whites. Tubman appears fully removed from white experience.

It is an affront to female beauty to try to pass off the ugliness and alien features of Tubman as a female icon. Whilst it may not be her fault what she looked like, to make a choice to use Tubman, who has the face of a primitive being full of black hostility, is a direct assault, even inversion of the notion of womanhood. One could argue that Tubman is female, but not a woman.

Indeed it seems far more likely to me Tubman was selected not for her achievements, but simply because she is so alien and hideous and hostile looking. Tubman’s grotesque image is guaranteed on one or more psychological levels (subconscious where Jewish leftist rhetoric has replaced natural values in the conscious mind in those with little defenses) to alienate whites from their own country and institutions and hurt their morale (putting aside whether the Fed is a white institution, the images on a nation’s currency should reflect its institutions).

And of course it is an affront to remove a great man like Jackson and to replace him with the above.

You know what I think ? How about Israel be the ‘light unto the nations’ here? And put Yasser Arafat, dead Palestinian women and children, Wafa Idris (first Palestinian female suicide bomber) or Rachel Corrie on THEIR currency to show the lessons and history of oppressed peoples and women in THEIR midst.

And I really really hope the backlash against this increases when people get the notes in their hands and see what a tacky monstrous debacle of Jewish overreach actually looks like.

Further reading:

Counter Currents

Pat Buchanan

I’m back

Hi. You probably don’t know me. But I used to run a political blog that had some small following, which due to a number of issues at the time, including other commitments, my own sanity and a series of threats made against me – I decided to put to rest for a while.

Like a lot of people in the movement I had experienced burnout. I had written myself into a corner that was bleak and miserable and dark. It was dirty work and someone had to do it, but at the same time it was difficult for me to see a light out of the tunnel.

I regret greatly that the old blog simply vanished, and that I may have dissapointed the followers I had. Although my views haven’t changed in that time. They are the same. The old blog may come back and articles from it may appear here. But I’m going to ask a request of readers here, if you see an article you like here please feel free to repost the entire thing on your own website or blog.

The topics we will be discussing here are political, metapolitical and social. I didn’t pull any punches before, and even in rightwing circles I realized there were people who were alienated by some of my themes.

Anyway, it’s been a while and I can see some old friends are still around, and some sadly have vanished, their writings forced off the internet by angry social justice warriors determined to distort the world into their own image.

One thing I wasn’t so widely aware of when I was blogging before was just the extent of the young rich world of what is called the Alt Right or, as I prefer the New Right. Needless to say this New Right is a blessing and I sincerely hope it can continue to grow and flourish and make an impact.